<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for How Plants Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howplantswork.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howplantswork.com</link>
	<description>exploring the inner workings of plants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Wood-Wide-Web: Are Plants Inter-Connected by a Subterranean Fungal Network? by AltNonFic</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2011/07/26/the-wood-wide-web-are-plants-inter-connected-by-a-subterranean-fungal-network/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>AltNonFic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howplantswork.com/?p=2276#comment-2813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome article!  The largest organism on Earth falls in this category, a shallowly subterranean fungus - these really challenge our view of life! 

Not a recent article, but this at least does confirm (what I&#039;ve heard from many people also) that plants do communicate with one another.  Fascinating!

http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10247/20120611/plants-communication-survival.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article!  The largest organism on Earth falls in this category, a shallowly subterranean fungus &#8211; these really challenge our view of life! </p>
<p>Not a recent article, but this at least does confirm (what I&#8217;ve heard from many people also) that plants do communicate with one another.  Fascinating!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10247/20120611/plants-communication-survival.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10247/20120611/plants-communication-survival.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Plants Make Flowers &#8211; Environmental Cues by plantguy</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2012/04/07/how-plants-make-flowers-environmental-cues/#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator>plantguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howplantswork.com/?p=2621#comment-2806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“When hit by boredom, let yourself be crushed by it; submerge, hit bottom. In general, with things unpleasant, the rule is: The sooner you hit bottom, the faster you surface. The idea here is to exact a full look at the worst. The reason boredom deserves such scrutiny is that it represents pure, undiluted time in all its repetitive, redundant, monotonous splendor.

Boredom is your window on the properties of time that one tends to ignore to the likely peril of one&#039;s mental equilibrium. It is your window on time&#039;s infinity. Once this window opens, don&#039;t try to shut it; on the contrary, throw it wide open.” 
― Joseph Brodsky

“Bliss - a-second-by-second joy and gratitude at the gift of being alive, conscious - lies on the other side of crushing, crushing boredom. Pay close attention to the most tedious thing you can find (Tax Returns, Televised Golf) and, in waves, a boredom like you’ve never known will wash over you and just about kill you. Ride these out, and it’s like stepping from black and white into color. Like water after days in the desert. Instant bliss in every atom.” 
― David Foster Wallace]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“When hit by boredom, let yourself be crushed by it; submerge, hit bottom. In general, with things unpleasant, the rule is: The sooner you hit bottom, the faster you surface. The idea here is to exact a full look at the worst. The reason boredom deserves such scrutiny is that it represents pure, undiluted time in all its repetitive, redundant, monotonous splendor.</p>
<p>Boredom is your window on the properties of time that one tends to ignore to the likely peril of one&#8217;s mental equilibrium. It is your window on time&#8217;s infinity. Once this window opens, don&#8217;t try to shut it; on the contrary, throw it wide open.”<br />
― Joseph Brodsky</p>
<p>“Bliss &#8211; a-second-by-second joy and gratitude at the gift of being alive, conscious &#8211; lies on the other side of crushing, crushing boredom. Pay close attention to the most tedious thing you can find (Tax Returns, Televised Golf) and, in waves, a boredom like you’ve never known will wash over you and just about kill you. Ride these out, and it’s like stepping from black and white into color. Like water after days in the desert. Instant bliss in every atom.”<br />
― David Foster Wallace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Plants Make Flowers &#8211; Environmental Cues by Myles Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2012/04/07/how-plants-make-flowers-environmental-cues/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howplantswork.com/?p=2621#comment-2805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so boring]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so boring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants Don&#8217;t Convert CO2 into O2 by Isabelle</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2009/02/16/plants-dont-convert-co2-into-o2/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howplantswork.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-2804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

I am glad I read through your comments section because I was wondering *why* a plant converted H2O to O2 (so... where did the H go?) but it got answered, thankfully, in the comments. You might want to consider adding that to your original explanation:) That the H is used to make ATP. I actually have a biology degree, but I really don&#039;t think we ever covered *this*. Yes, I also assumed it was CO2 -&gt; O2. Although farther down in your explanation you say that the 6 extra O go to making 3x O2 for breathing, but then doesn&#039;t that means that SOME of the CO2 goes to O2?

This might be a far out question, but how is it possible that we have more carbon now than we did 10,000 years ago? We aren&#039;t &#039;creating&#039; carbon, so where is it coming from? Is it because we are burning fossil fuels, so we are &#039;freeing&#039; that carbon? If that is the case, then it would be wonderful to create a device that converts H2O and CO2 into O2 and just C (which could be made into graphite, or graphene, or carbon nanotubes, etc). Carbon is such an excellent super conductor, that it seems as though we should spend more time isolating it out of CO2. If we figure out how to make diamonds out of it directly, that would be helpful too.

So... the reason I am so interested in this all of a sudden is because of Mars. If we could make a large dome of some sort, and figure out how to effectively use solar panels to convert enough CO2 to O2, then we could start planting trees in the dome to convert more. (short version of my thought) But clearly all that would do it simply lock up the carbon in carbohydrates:( Is there any chemical process that will release the O2 from the carbohydrates? (I am totally okay with you editing this down, or omitting it from the comments if it is too unwieldy, etc:) )

Thanks! -Isabelle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am glad I read through your comments section because I was wondering *why* a plant converted H2O to O2 (so&#8230; where did the H go?) but it got answered, thankfully, in the comments. You might want to consider adding that to your original explanation:) That the H is used to make ATP. I actually have a biology degree, but I really don&#8217;t think we ever covered *this*. Yes, I also assumed it was CO2 -&gt; O2. Although farther down in your explanation you say that the 6 extra O go to making 3x O2 for breathing, but then doesn&#8217;t that means that SOME of the CO2 goes to O2?</p>
<p>This might be a far out question, but how is it possible that we have more carbon now than we did 10,000 years ago? We aren&#8217;t &#8216;creating&#8217; carbon, so where is it coming from? Is it because we are burning fossil fuels, so we are &#8216;freeing&#8217; that carbon? If that is the case, then it would be wonderful to create a device that converts H2O and CO2 into O2 and just C (which could be made into graphite, or graphene, or carbon nanotubes, etc). Carbon is such an excellent super conductor, that it seems as though we should spend more time isolating it out of CO2. If we figure out how to make diamonds out of it directly, that would be helpful too.</p>
<p>So&#8230; the reason I am so interested in this all of a sudden is because of Mars. If we could make a large dome of some sort, and figure out how to effectively use solar panels to convert enough CO2 to O2, then we could start planting trees in the dome to convert more. (short version of my thought) But clearly all that would do it simply lock up the carbon in carbohydrates:( Is there any chemical process that will release the O2 from the carbohydrates? (I am totally okay with you editing this down, or omitting it from the comments if it is too unwieldy, etc:) )</p>
<p>Thanks! -Isabelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants Don&#8217;t Convert CO2 into O2 by Avik</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2009/02/16/plants-dont-convert-co2-into-o2/#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>Avik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howplantswork.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-2801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[your explanation is exactly what i used to tell my folks and every other person who shoved a few type of plants in my face and tell me that they convert CO2 to O2. Later on i didn&#039;t even bother to explain because neither did they know enough science nor were they going to accept that they were wrong. I am happy and fulfilled to see i was not just making up theories. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your explanation is exactly what i used to tell my folks and every other person who shoved a few type of plants in my face and tell me that they convert CO2 to O2. Later on i didn&#8217;t even bother to explain because neither did they know enough science nor were they going to accept that they were wrong. I am happy and fulfilled to see i was not just making up theories. <img src='http://www.howplantswork.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s New About How Plants Work? &#8211; Some &#8220;Tasty Tidbits&#8221; From 2012 (First Course) by Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2012/12/31/whats-new-about-how-plants-work-some-tasty-tidbits-from-2012-first-course/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howplantswork.com/?p=3027#comment-2788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for catching me up on the many discoveries of 2012! I just discovered this blog so I&#039;m enjoying this buffet. In this post, I found the article on lead especially interesting, since my backyard is contaminated by runoff from a lead-painted house. Not that I&#039;m going to start introducing fungi on my own...but I can&#039;t wait to hear whether there&#039;s a marketable solution made possible by these findings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for catching me up on the many discoveries of 2012! I just discovered this blog so I&#8217;m enjoying this buffet. In this post, I found the article on lead especially interesting, since my backyard is contaminated by runoff from a lead-painted house. Not that I&#8217;m going to start introducing fungi on my own&#8230;but I can&#8217;t wait to hear whether there&#8217;s a marketable solution made possible by these findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants in Space by Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2012/12/16/plants-in-space/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howplantswork.com/?p=3012#comment-2786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi

I found this fascinating.  In my nievity I had assumed that plants grew towards the light, it hadnt occured to me gravity was involved.  

Thanks

Helen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I found this fascinating.  In my nievity I had assumed that plants grew towards the light, it hadnt occured to me gravity was involved.  </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Helen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Want a Nobel Prize?….Don&#8217;t Study Plants. by plantguy</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2012/10/11/want-a-nobel-prize-dont-study-plants/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator>plantguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howplantswork.com/?p=2925#comment-2784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Mike.
I enjoyed visiting your website.
Cheers,
Richard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike.<br />
I enjoyed visiting your website.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Want a Nobel Prize?….Don&#8217;t Study Plants. by Mike Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2012/10/11/want-a-nobel-prize-dont-study-plants/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howplantswork.com/?p=2925#comment-2781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed reading this post. You mentioned Norman Borlaug, who I met in the early 90s. You might like to read my blog post about Borlaug: 
http://mikejackson1948.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/norman-borlaug-tireless-advocate-of-research-for-development/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading this post. You mentioned Norman Borlaug, who I met in the early 90s. You might like to read my blog post about Borlaug:<br />
<a href="http://mikejackson1948.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/norman-borlaug-tireless-advocate-of-research-for-development/" rel="nofollow">http://mikejackson1948.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/norman-borlaug-tireless-advocate-of-research-for-development/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plants Don&#8217;t Convert CO2 into O2 by plantguy</title>
		<link>http://www.howplantswork.com/2009/02/16/plants-dont-convert-co2-into-o2/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>plantguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howplantswork.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-2752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good idea....others have thought of it, too.
Several problems, however. 
More people -&gt; chop down more trees to clear land for agriculture &amp; for fuel to burn -&gt; fewer trees -&gt; more CO2 -&gt; more global warming -&gt; higher temps -&gt; kill even more trees. ( see, for example: http://www.climatecentral.org/news/climate-change-stress-killing-forests-and-why-it-matters-14960 )
Still a good idea to plant more trees, though. It may slow global warming down a bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea&#8230;.others have thought of it, too.<br />
Several problems, however.<br />
More people -> chop down more trees to clear land for agriculture &#038; for fuel to burn -> fewer trees -> more CO2 -> more global warming -> higher temps -> kill even more trees. ( see, for example: <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/climate-change-stress-killing-forests-and-why-it-matters-14960" rel="nofollow">http://www.climatecentral.org/news/climate-change-stress-killing-forests-and-why-it-matters-14960</a> )<br />
Still a good idea to plant more trees, though. It may slow global warming down a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
