Feed on
Posts
Comments

3604999084 abe6ebba70“It’s Through The Wire…”

Most plants in the wild are interconnected via common mycorrhizal networks (CMN) .

The “Wood-Wide-Web” and Plant “Social Networks” are two previous posts that explore one of the most intriguing – and frustrating – subjects in plant biology. Intriguing, because vascular land plants likely owe their existence to mycorrhizae. Frustrating, because these plant-fungal relationships are very difficult to study experimentally.

That CMN’s exist among plants has been long-known. And biologists have long-wondered whether or not substances travel from plant-to-plant via these fungal networks (e.g., see refs. 2 & 3 below). But unequivocal and reproducible evidence has been difficult to obtain.

A paper published in 2010 (see ref. 1 below), reported evidence that chemical signals that elicit plant defensive responses can travel between tomato plants via CMN’s.

Volatile plant chemical signals are known to travel from plant-to-plant through the air to trigger plant defense responses. (Please see previous post on airborne chemical signals.)

A paper published online 9 May 2013 in Ecology Letters (see ref. 4 below) has added to the scientific evidence in favor of the idea that interplant communication via CMN’s exists. (For a summary of this paper, please see plants use underground networks to warn of enemy attack.)

Like ref. 1, this study used plants of the same species, grown under controlled conditions in the greenhouse. Though much more difficult, it will be interesting to see if experiments using plants in natural environments yield similar results. Especially when considering that different plant species are inter-connected via CMN’s.

Are defensive signals traveling through the CMN’s plant-species-specific, or do such signals activate all the plants “on the network”?

References

1. Song, Y. Y., et al. (2010) “Interplant Communication of Tomato Plants through Underground Common Mycorrhizal Networks.” PLoS ONE, 5, e13324. (Full Text)

2. Barto, K.E., et al. (2011) “The Fungal Fast Lane: Common Mycorrhizal Networks Extend Bioactive Zones of Allelochemicals in Soils.” PLoS ONE, 6, e27195. (Full Text)

3. Barto, K. E. (2012) “Fungal superhighways: do common mycorrhizal networks enhance below ground communication?” Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 17, pp. 633–637. (Abstract)

4. Babikova, Z., et al. (2013) “Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighbouring plants of aphid attack.” Ecology Letters, published online 9 May 2013. (Abstract)

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

Screen Shot 2013 04 30 at 2 06 54 PMAfter Nearly 20 Years, What’s Up With Genetically-Engineered Crops?

Genetically-engineered (or more commonly referred to as “genetically-modified”) crops have come along way since the ill-fated “Flavr Savr” tomato was first commercially produced and sold in 1994.

Did you know that in 2012 genetically-modified (GM) corn, soybean and cotton accounted for nearly 90% of total planted acres of these crops in the United States? (see current USDA data)

Consequently, the U.S. produces more GM crops than any other country.

But the rest of the world is quickly catching up, with Canada, Argentina, Brazil, India, Australia, and China all planting more and more GM crops. (Please see here for current data on international GM crops.)

HowPlantsWork.com has previously explored various topics involving transgenic plants, beginning here.

What motivated me to revisit this topic is a recent special issue of Nature magazine (2 May 2013, see cover above), which provides excellent articles summarizing the current state of affairs of probably the most controversial subject in the plant sciences, namely, commercially-grown GM crop plants.

Hat’s Off to Nature Magazine

Please Note: All the articles linked to below are free to read online, even if you don’t have a subscription. So, first, thanks to the publishers of Nature magazine for that.

Probably the best place to start is the brief introduction: Plant biotechnology: Tarnished promise.

Next up, see how pervasive GM crops have become in the American, and international, agricultural landscape by reading: GM Crops: A Story in Numbers (please be sure to check out the informative slideshow provided).

Are GM crops fueling the rise of herbicide-resistant ‘superweeds’? Are they driving farmers in India to commit suicide? Are the foreign transgenes in GM crops finding their way into other plants? These questions are addressed by Natasha Gilbert in: Case studies: A hard look at GM crops.

Where to from here for GM crops? I’ve explored this question in a previous post. But a more recent update is presented by Daniel Cressey in his excellent article entitled: Transgenics: A New Breed

Finally, the editors of Nature provide their take on GM crops in Fields of Gold. (Spoiler Alert!) Their conclusion: “Research on transgenic crops must be done outside industry if it is to fulfil its early promise.“.

But Wait, There’s More….

In addition to these freely-accessible news articles, Nature has also included in this special issue a “Perspective” article that “…reviews research on membrane transporters in plants that could lead to traits such as stress resistance and increased nutrient content.” (see Ref. 1 below). Although this article is only available, in full, to subscribers, you can read a thorough summary of it here.

Reference

1. Schroeder, J. I., et al. (2013) “Using membrane transporters to improve crops for sustainable food production.” Nature, Vol. 497, pp. 60–66. (Abstract)

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

On Dandelions

Much Maligned. Highly Underrated?

The common dandelion that you often see in the spring in North America is, most likely, Taraxacum officinale.

How dandelions reproduce by cloning themselves and how herbicides kill dandelions, but not your lawn are two subjects I’ve previously explored here.

But if you’d like some more information about these plants that are seemingly ubiquitous this time of year because of their bright yellow flowers, here are some online resources:

One of best sources I’ve found is: All about dandelions by Dr. T. Ombrello of the UCC Biology Department.

I recently found this most excellent post called Dandelion Folklore, History & Uses by “webscribbler”.

Perhaps to the chagrin of suburban “lawnscapers” who spend so much time and effort and money in eradicating dandelions, did you know that dandelions are actually commercially cultivated in many places in the United States? Vineland, New Jersey, may indeed be the “dandelion capital of the world”. See here and here for why.

Also, did you know that dandelions can be a significant source of latex for the manufacture of tires (or tyres, if you’re outside the USA or Canada)?

It’s true! See here and here, for just two links.

Yes, and because of this, dandelions are plants of interest to biotechnologists in the USA, Germany, and the Netherlands.

Bottom Line: So, despite the fact that millions of pounds of herbicides are used every year to kill them in lawns throughout the USA, dandelions can be used for food and as herbs, to make wine (“mellow yellow”), and even to make tires (or tyres).

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

Jatropha hybrid - Leaf detail (129 DAS)

Jatropha hybrid – Leaf detail (129 DAS) (CC BY-SA 2.0) by Ton Rulkens

One Thing Leads To Another….

You’ve probably already read the New York Times article about how bean leaf surfaces can entrap bedbugs (the trichomes on the leaf surfaces are microscopic velcro-like hooks, ensnaring the bedbugs). If you haven’t yet, it’s certainly worth checking out.

This NY Times story is about a paper (see Ref. 1 below) that was recently published online in The Journal of the Royal Society Interface, which, I must admit, is a journal I don’t read very often…(well, to be honest, I’ve never read it.)

Briefly, this paper shows that the bedbugs can be trapped pretty effectively on the surface of bean leaves, but a synthetic material mimicking the bean leaf surface doesn’t work so well.

But while perusing the current contents of The Journal of the Royal Society Interface, I spotted another paper (see Ref. 2 below) which looked interesting. (You can read brief summaries of this paper here and here.)

This paper is about the nature of sugar transport in the phloem, which I liken to the internet because, after all, the phloem really is just a series of tubes.

Anyway, some scientists at Harvard University were curious about what is the optimal sugar (mostly sucrose) concentration in the phloem for sugar transport in plants.

For example, if the sugar concentration was too low, then not much energy could be effectively supplied from the leaves to the other parts the plant. But if the sugar concentration was too high, then it would be very viscous, and this high viscosity would serve as a drag to efficient transport.

So, what these researchers did was simply go back into the literature and look at what other people had measured for the sugar content in the phloem from at least 40 different plant species.

What the data showed was “…an average concentration in the range from 18.2 per cent (all species) to 21.1 per cent (active loaders), suggesting that the phloem vasculature is optimized for efficient transport at constant pressure and that active phloem loading may have developed to increase transport efficiency.” (from Ref 2 below)

In other words, these investigators calculated that the optimal sugar concentration would be around 23.5% (presuming phloem pressure is constant). What they discovered from the old data is that most plants apparently do indeed maintain nearly this optimal sugar concentration in the phloem. In order to do this, however, the plants must expend energy to actively pump sugars into the phloem (“phloem loading”) at the sources (the leaves).

References

1. Szyndler, M. W., K. F. Haynes, M. F. Potter, R. M. Corn and C. Loudon (2013) “Entrapment of bed bugs by leaf trichomes inspires microfabrication of biomimetic surfaces.” The Journal of the Royal Society Interface, (published online 10 April 2013). (Abstract)

2. Jensen, K. H., J. A. Savage and N. M. Holbrook (2013) “Optimal concentration for sugar transport in plants.” The Journal of the Royal Society Interface, (published online 20 March 2013). (Abstract)

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

The Science of Flower Development….Doesn’t It Ruin the Aesthetic Beauty of Flowers?

I’m aware of no better answer to such a question than this one from Richard Feynman:

OK, now back to flower development, in general, and daffodils, in particular.…

About The Daffodil’s “Trumpet”

A report recently published online in The Plant Journal (please see Ref. 1 below) addresses questions about the nature of the daffodil flower. Although only a summary of this article is currently available online (unless you subscribe to this scientific journal), I’ve been able read the full text (so that you don’t have to). Here’s my take on this story.

8479482887 032d74d56c bMaybe we should start by taking a closer look at the flower of the daffodil.

Starting from the outside working in, the six petals are actually “tepals”, which are a kind of developmental combination of sepals and petals.

Next up is the famous trumpet-shaped part of the daffodil flower called the corona (“crown”) that is the main subject of this blog post.

The central part of the daffodil flower consists of the six stamens that encircle the carpel (gynoecium). In the photo (right), you can barely see the anthers (produce pollen) of the stamens, and also you can only see the top of the carpel called the stigma (receives pollen).

When And How Is A Daffodil Flower Made?

You maybe surprised to find out that a small version of the daffodil flower actually develops not in the spring just before it blooms, but at the end of the previous growth season. Thus, a floral bud is fully formed, and over-winters, within the dormant bulb.

This meant that the plant scientists investigating daffodil flower formation (see Ref. 1 below) had to dissect out flower buds from the developing bulbs. Whew!

As a result of these efforts they discovered that the daffodil corona forms relatively late in the flower-development program.

As described in a previous post, the flower-development program can be described like a play with several acts.

376px One daffodil bulbIn the first act, the plant genetically shifts from a vegetative state to a flowering state. In the second stage, which I call “arranging the chairs”, the spatial arrangement of the flower is determined. In the third act, which I call “seating the guests”, the different flower parts (in this case, tepals, stamens and carpel) are seated in their appropriate “chairs”.

In daffodils (and perhaps other species within the Amaryllis plant family that have trumpet-shaped flowers) there apparently is a fourth act. In this final act of daffodil flower development, new “chairs” are provided and arranged in a circle between the rings of the tepals and the stamens. The “late” guests are then seated. The question was: to which of the four basic flower parts (sepals, petals, stamens, carpels) are these “late” guests related? Turns out they are genetically related to stamens.

But, of course, an obvious question is: how does the daffodil make something that looks like petals by starting with the genetic “blueprints” for stamens?

The honest answer is we simply don’t know at the present time. It should be mentioned, however, that some of the results of Ref. 1 show that there is a late burst of coronal growth in the spring, so a great deal of elaboration of the “stamen” program is happening to result in a petal-like structure. This and other evidence suggest that petal-like structures “…can be produced by different genetic pathways even within the same flower.” (from Ref 1 below)

Why The Trumpet-Shaped Flower?

Most explanations from botanists involve attracting pollinators. But who pollinates domesticated daffodils? Mostly likely, it’s people!

Most of the showy daffodils that we see in the spring in parks and around homes and businesses are a product of plant breeding, i.e., artificial selection, not natural selection. (You can read more about this here.)

That is, such daffodil flowers are a product of what has looked good to humans (daffodil breeders especially), not insects. Indeed, most of the domesticated daffodils that we see in the spring may not be especially attractive to bees, and thus the daffodils may not even be pollinated (unless the bees are desperate).

What about the origin and evolution of trumpet-shaped flowers (before humans got involved)?

No one can be absolutely certain of an answer, but the long narrow corona of the genus Narcissus may have evolved to accommodate pollination by bees over butterflies or moths, which can’t easily enter the tall narrow corona to access the pollen. (from Ref. 2 below)

393px Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio Narcissus WGA04109In Summary:

If all of the above was a bit much, it might help to listen to a brief (4 min) audio clip about the daffodil’s mysterious trumpet courtesy of The Science Show on Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s RadioNational.

OK, if you’ve listened to this audio clip, then you’ve heard that the “trumpet” or “corona” of the daffodil flower is probably not an extension of the petals, as previously thought, but is a distinct organ – sharing genetic identity with stamens.

If you haven’t listened (and even if you have), you can read brief summaries of Ref. 1 below here and here.

References

1. Waters, M. T., A. M. M. Tiley, E. M. Kramer, A. W. Meerow, J. A. Langdale, and R. W. Scotland (2013) “The corona of the daffodil Narcissus bulbocodium shares stamen-like identity and is distinct from the orthodox floral whorls.” The Plant Journal, article first published online: 13 MAR 2013 (Abstract)

2. Graham, S. W. and S. C. H. Barrett (2004) “Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of styler polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae).” American Journal of Botany, Vol. 91, pp. 1007–1021. (PDF)

Photo Attributions:

Daffodil flower – JKehoe_Photos

Daffodil bulb – By Dvortygirl (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons

Painting of Narcissus – Caravaggio [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

179193754 4e933af4f6Pancakes With A Side of Math

What better time to talk about where maple syrup comes from than “sap season”? This is time of the year – early March – when the sap typically is flowing in the sugar maple trees that grow in the northeastern part of North America.

What drew my attention to this timely subject was a recent paper (see Ref. 1 below) about what exactly causes the sugar maple sap to flow in such abundant quantities in the early spring.

This paper about maple trees was published in a most unlikely place – a mathematics journal. The reason for this is because the authors provide mathematical calculations to support a current theory regarding what drives the springtime sap flow in sugar maple trees.

However, before we get bogged down in this sticky subject, first a let’s sop up little background information.

Go With The Flow

A general explanation about why sap flows in some deciduous trees during the transition from winter into spring goes something like this:

The story really begins in the previous fall. Before their leaves drop in the autumn, the trees try to retrieve and store as many photosynthetically-produced carbon compounds from the old leaves as they can. A lot of these carbon compounds are converted into glucose, which is then stored over the winter as starch in the stems and in the roots of the trees.

At the end of the cold winter when temperatures start to warm up a bit, living cells in the trees begin convert the starch back into sugars in order to support the new growth in the spring.

Also, with the melting of the snow, the soils may become saturated, or nearly so, with water.

4415049940 e80a64fdbeThe combination of the abundant amount of sugars in the tree along with the plentiful source of water in the soil allows the plant to osmotically take up large amounts of this water.

In some trees, such as birch, this so-called “root pressure” may indeed drive water flow (sap flow) from the roots up the trunk and into, at least, the lower branches of the tree.

Alternatively, “stem pressure” may drive sap flow in some trees in the spring, in particular, maple trees.

Unlike root pressure in birch, stem pressure in maple is highly dependent on temperature; several freeze-thaw cycles are needed to initiate significant positive pressures.” (from: Ref. 2 below)

What Causes This Stem Pressure?

Because maple syrup is economically so important in the northeastern parts of Canada and the United States, this question has attracted a lot of attention, along with ample research funding, I might add.

Basically, two theories have emerged.

The first, and older, of the two has to do with expanding gases in the xylem.

Briefly, this “physical” model attributes sap flow entirely to pressure and volume changes resulting from passive, physical effects in the tree’s vascular tissue, that is, the expansion and contraction of gas, as well as freezing and thawing of sap, which occur in response to temperature changes. (The calculations presented in Ref. 1 below support this theory.)

The second theory states that positive pressures are developed in sugar maple stems when temperatures fluctuate around freezing mainly due to osmotic processes. This “osmotic” theory relies on the involvement of living cells that convert starch into sucrose, which is then actively transported into the vessels. This increased sucrose concentration in the vessels osmotically attracts water, which results in increased stem pressure. (The experimental results of Ref. 2 below support this theory.)

Bottom Line: Looks like “the jury is still out” regarding the driving force chiefly responsible for sugar maple sap flow in the spring.

References

1. Ceseri, M. and J. M. Stockie (2013) “A mathematical model of sap exudation in maple trees governed by ice melting, gas dissolution, and osmosis.” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 73, pp. 649–676. (Abstract)

2. Cirelli, D., R. Jagels and M. T. Tyree (2008) “Toward an improved model of maple sap exudation: the location and role of osmotic barriers in sugar maple, butternut and white birch.” Tree Physiology, Vol. 28, pp. 1145–1155. (PDF)

For More Information: The life of a sugar maple tree from Cornell University.

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

34799355 5cf831972a oThe Increasing Need for More Salt-Tolerant Crop Plants

The salinization of soils is a very serious agricultural problem. Because saline soils can adversely affect the establishment, growth, and development of crop plants, leading to huge losses in yield, the significance of soil salinity in reducing agricultural productivity is enormous.

Unfortunately, the salinity of croplands is increasing steadily in many parts of the world, especially in arid and semiarid regions. And the effects of “global weirding” will likely exacerbate the situation.

Despite efforts to address this problem using better soil management and cropping practices, it remains a growing threat to agriculture worldwide.

It’s clear that these improved management practices must also be accompanied by a better array of salt-tolerant crop plants available to farmers.

But where will such plants come from?

Breeding, Grafting, and Genetically-Engineering Crop Plants for Increased Salt Tolerance

Some salt-tolerant crop plants already exist, such as some varieties of barley. Traits that help confer salt tolerance in these barley varieties may be bred into other cereals, such as wheat, for example. Plant breeders may also use wild relatives of existing crop species as sources of “salt-tolerance” genes.

A recent report regarding the evolution of salt tolerance in grasses may explain why it’s been so difficult to breed salt tolerance into cereals despite the fact that there are many naturally salt-tolerant grasses in the world. Briefly, this study indicates that wild grasses may be able to adapt to saline conditions relatively quickly (from an evolutionary perspective), but then discard these adaptations if not needed. This suggests that plant breeders probably have a good chance of being able to generate salt tolerant cereal crop plants, but it also says that these adaptations likely come with significant costs to the plant.

Another approach that may be viable, using crops such as tomato, is grafting salt-sensitive, but desirable, varieties onto salt-tolerant rootstocks. (e.g., see ref. 2 below)

As plant biologists learn more precisely about how salt tolerance works at the cellular and molecular levels in plant cells, specific genes may also be introduced into crop plants by genetic engineering.

Such examples include proteins involved in the membrane transport of salts in plant cells. (e.g., see Ref. 3 below)

Domesticating Halophytes3824945873 0f11727ce9 n

Instead of trying to make current crop plants more salt tolerant, why not domesticate plants that are already salt tolerant to use as crop plants?

As described in Ref. 4 below: “Our approach has been to domesticate wild, salt-tolerant plants, called halophytes, for use as food, forage and oilseed crops. We reasoned that changing the basic physiology of a traditional crop plant from salt-sensitive to salt-tolerant would be difficult and that it might be more feasible to domesticate a wild, salt-tolerant plant. After all, our modern crops started out as wild plants.”

Unfortunately, this approach has not proved to be successful so far, except in limited cases of use as forage plants.

Can Mycorrhizae Help Save the Day?

Mycorrhizae are symbiotic relationships that form in the soil between certain fungi and most native plants. One of the benefits plants may get by forming mycorrhizal associations is improved salt tolerance, which has been well documented. (for example, see Ref. 5 below)

It may be possible to improve salt tolerance in crop plants by encouraging mycorrhizal associations under cultivated conditions.

Also, by learning how mycorrhizal fungi help improve plant salt tolerance may help in developing salt-tolerant crops.

Seawater Greenhouses in the Desert?

Finally, it’s worth mentioning that there are people who are using seawater in a much different approach in trying to grow crop plants in deserts.

Briefly, this approach is to use solar power to generate electricity to convert seawater into freshwater. This freshwater is then used to irrigate plants in greenhouses. (For example, please see references 6, 7 & 8 below.)

SGFarm

Bottom line: At least two things seem clear. Firstly, we need to know a lot more about the basic biology of salt-tolerance mechanisms in plants. Secondly, solutions to the problem of ever-increasing saline soils will likely come from multiple approaches.

References

1. Barrett-Lennard, E. G. and T. L. Setter (2010) “Developing saline agriculture: moving from traits and genes to systems.” Functional Plant Biology, Vol. 37 , pp. iii-iv. (PDF)

2. Sanchez-Bel, P., Egea, I., Flores, F. B. and Bolarin, M. C. (2012) “Tomato: Grafting to Improve Salt Tolerance.”, in Improving Crop Resistance to Abiotic Stress, Volume 1 & Volume 2 (eds N. Tuteja, S. S. Gill, A. F. Tiburcio and R. Tuteja), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany. doi: 10.1002/9783527632930.ch42 (Abstract)

3. Mian, A. A., et al. (2010) “Improving crop salt tolerance: anion and cation transporters as genetic engineering targets.” Plant Stress 5 (PDF)

4. Glenn, E. P., J. J. Brown and J. W. O’Leary (1998) “Irrigating crops with seawater.” Scientific American, August 1998, pp. 76-81. (PDF)

5. Evelin, H., R. Kapoor, and B. Giri (2009) “Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review.” Annals of Botany, Vol. 104 pp. 1263-1280. (PDF)

6. Jonathan Margolis (2012) “Growing food in the desert: is this the solution to the world’s food crisis?.” The Observer, Saturday 24 November 2012. (Full Text)

7. Sundrop Farms

8. Seawater Greenhouse

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

Atriplex argentea by Matt Lavin

Atriplex argentea (CC BY-SA 2.0) by Matt Lavin

Yes, You Can Water Some Plants With Seawater

Although salty water and saline environments are usually harmful to most plants, why should anybody care about salt stress on plants?

Here’s a good answer to that question:
Ubiquitously, no toxic substance restricts plant growth more than does salt. Salt stress presents an increasing threat to plant agriculture. Among the various sources of soil salinity, irrigation combined with poor drainage is the most serious, because it represents losses of once productive agricultural land. The reason for this so-called ‘secondary salinization’ (as opposed to primary salinization of seashore salty marshes) is simple: water will evaporate but salts remain and accumulate in the soil.” (from Ref. 1 below)

So, it’s clear that soil salinity is of serious concern to people involved in agriculture, and the evidence suggests that this problem is getting worse. What are some possible solutions?

Well, the obvious solution is to try to make crop plants more salt tolerant. But how?

One approach plant scientists have used is to study plants that are naturally salt tolerant and see how they are able to grow, and even thrive, under saline conditions. Such plants are called “halophytes”, and some halophytes can even grow in seawater. (By the way, plants unable to resist salts to the same degree as halophytes are sometimes called glycophytes, “sweet plants”.)

The two most well-known examples of halophytes are mangroves and saltbush (genus Atriplex). Mangroves usually grow at the intersection of the land and the sea, in the tropics and the subtropics. In contrast, saltbush is typically found in desert environments, with alkaline soils.

How do such plants tolerate such high salt levels? Plant scientists have been investigating this question for decades and have found three common strategies that halophytes typically use in order to tolerate saline conditions: exclusion, sequestration, and excretion.

Mangrove (CC-BY-2.0) by jimw

Mangrove (CC-BY-2.0) by jimw

Perhaps the best strategy is exclusion. In this case, the roots actually filter out sodium chloride by using waxy layers around cells in order to force the saline solution to have to pass across semipermeable cell membranes. Such membranes allow water to flow through, but resist the passage of the highly charged sodium and chloride ions.

In highly saline environments, some sodium chloride is able to leak through the exclusion barriers and into the roots and up to the shoots and the leaves along with the flow of water. Halophytes can use two other strategies in order to deal with this problem.

What do people often do with stuff that they no longer want? Answer: They stick it in the garage. And that’s how many halophytes deal with toxic sodium; they stick it in the plant cell’s garage, a.k.a., the vacuole.

Most, if not all, enzymes in halophytes are just as sensitive to sodium as glycophytes. So most halophytes have special sodium “pumps” in the vacuole that use cellular energy to transport sodium from the cytoplasm into the vacuole. (Think of a sump pump, pumping out any water that leaks into a basement.)

The cytoplasm contains a lot of enzymes that are very sensitive to sodium. In contrast, the inside of the vacuole contains relatively few enzymes, and thus is metabolically inactive compared the the rest of the cell. So, sodium can accumulate inside the vacuole without harming the rest of the cell.

The third strategy that halophytes may use to tolerate saline environments is to simply excrete any sodium that leaks into the plant. Saltbush, for example, is well-known for doing this. Indeed, the leaves of saltbush often appear silvery due to salt crystals on the surface of the leaves. (e.g., see photo above right)

Although halophytes may employ three different strategies in order to tolerate saline conditions, can any of these strategies be used to render major crop plants more salt tolerant?

Next time: We’ll explore some current strategies that people are using in order to deal with the growing problem of salt stress in agriculture.

References

1. Zhu, J.-K. (2007) “Plant Salt Stress.” (PDF)

2. The Mangrove Action Project (Website)

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

5076907896 5740feb4e4Why Not Irrigate Plants With Seawater?

A recent report about how salt stops plant growth got me wondering about what’s the latest news regarding plant salt tolerance.

But first, let’s see why watering most plants (including all the major crop plants) with seawater would be harmful, and likely be lethal.

You can’t water most plants with seawater for pretty much the same reason you can’t drink seawater to keep you from dehydrating.

It’s because of the salt, primarily, the sodium chloride. More specifically, it’s because the level of sodium chloride is so high.

Seawater has a salinity of about 3.5% dissolved salts – predominantly sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl-) ions. I did the math (so that you don’t have to), and it works out to be about 4.7 ounces of sodium chloride per gallon of water, or about a half a cup of table salt dissolved in a gallon of water.

I won’t go in to why it’s harmful for humans to drink seawater – you can read all about it here.

Let’s focus on why high salinity, specifically high sodium chloride levels, is harmful to most plants.

“Water, water, everywhere,…”

Back in the day, when I was teaching botany lab, one of the experiments we did in this class was to water beans and corn seedlings with artificial seawater and to see what happened. It didn’t take very long for the leaves of these plants to start wilting, as if they were drying out, even though the plants were in soil that was literally saturated with water.

This little experiment effectively demonstrated the first harmful effect of high salinity on plants, namely, the osmotic effects.

I should pause here and remind you that under normal conditions water moves from the soil into the roots, and from the roots up to the shoots, etc., passively, via osmosis.

Warning: The word “osmosis” is one of those unfortunate terms that induces the “MEGO” response in most people, especially students in class. (MEGO= “my eyes glaze over”.) So, let’s try to avoid the “O” word, shall we? And proceed….

3041145016 57fe4975cfSo, putting it another way, the reason that plants can take up water from the soil and move it up to the leaves is NOT because they have little water pumps actively pumping the water into the roots and up the plant. There are no such little water pumps in plants. So how do land plants get and move water?

Here’s how:

First, it’s important to keep in mind that water tends to move passively (diffuse) from a place of relative high water concentration to a place of relative low water concentration. Think of opening a bottle of smelly perfume at one end of the room. Pretty soon you’ll be able to smell the perfume at the other end of the room. Why is that? Because the smelly perfume has moved passively (diffused) from an area of relatively high concentration – the bottle – to the other end of the room, where perfume concentration is relatively very low. Given enough time, the perfume smell will eventually fill up the entire room, reaching what some might call a diffusion equilibrium.

What would be an example of high water concentration? Answer: pure water; pure distilled water, with no dissolved salts (solutes). And an example of relatively low water concentration? Answer: water with a lot of dissolved salts; classic example = seawater.

So, the reason watering plants with seawater causes them to wilt (draws water out of the plant) is because the seawater has a lower water concentration than the plant. And because the water molecules will passively diffuse from relatively high concentration to relatively low concentration, the seawater will draw the water right out of the poor plants.

But, you might ask, why doesn’t the saltwater just diffuse into the plant so that some kind of diffusion equilibrium is reached, sort of like the perfume smell eventually filling the empty room.

Good question!

For the answer, we have to go back to osmosis. The key to osmosis is the presence of a semipermeable membrane, which allows water to pass through it, but NOT dissolved solutes, especially salts. All living cells, including plant cells, are surrounded by semipermeable membranes. So, water can easily flow in and out of the cells osmotically, but not dissolved salts. Indeed, to move dissolved solutes across the membranes, cells typically have to make little pores or transporters in the membrane in order to do so.

2477266021_17875c4ac3Whew! It can take a lot of time to try to explain why high-salt conditions tends to draw water out of plants. (For a more thorough discussion, please see Ref. 2 below.) But let’s get back to seeing what the most harmful effects of osmotic (salinity) stress are on plants.

Perhaps most important point is to note that that plant osmotic stress caused by saline soils results in many of the same physiological effects on plants as does drought (i.e., water stress).

Briefly, since plants rely on water uptake for growth, one of the first the observable effects of high salinity conditions on most plants is the inhibition or even cessation of growth.

Although less sensitive to water stress than plant growth, both protein synthesis and photosynthesis are also inhibited by plant water stress caused by saline environments.

The Toxic Effects of Too Much Salt

In addition to the osmotic effects on plants, the second problem when most plants are exposed to high salinity conditions (e.g., saline soils) is that sodium, and certain other ions, are toxic to plants when their concentrations are relatively high.

Despite the semipermeable membranes, under high salinity conditions, sodium chloride and other dissolved salts can leak into the cells.

Under normal conditions, the cytoplasm of plant cells typically contains a lot more (10x to 50x) potassium ions (K+) than sodium ions.

Abnormally high amounts of Na+ and high concentrations of total salts can inactivate some enzymes and inhibit protein synthesis.

At a high concentration, Na+ may displace calcium ions (Ca++) from the cell membranes, causing them to become “leaky”, that is, to lose their semipermeable nature. This can have disastrous, even lethal, effects on plant cells. Photosynthesis is also inhibited when high concentrations of Na+ and/or Cl- accumulate in chloroplasts.

These are just a few of the harmful effects that salt can have on plants. Although most plants, and virtually all crop plants, are sensitive to high levels of salt, there are some plants called halophytes that grow in water of high salinity, even seawater. How do they do it?

We’ll see how such plants “work” next time.

References

1. Zhu, J.-K. (2007) “Plant Salt Stress.” (PDF)

2. Bray, E. A. (1997) “Plant responses to water deficit.” Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 2, pp. 48-54. (PDF)

HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

8080742303 3ea08767d6A Final Taste of 2012

  • One of the oldest mysteries of plant breeding is why hybrid plants usually provide significantly higher yields than their homozygous parents. Plant breeders have known about this for more than 100 years, and they have used this effect, called hybrid vigor or heterosis, to obtain greater crop yields. Scientists have puzzled over the molecular processes underlying this phenomenon for many years. Do we now have an answer?
    Hybrid Corn: Do more active genes lead to higher yields?
  • Charles Darwin famously called the apparently sudden appearance and rapid spread of flowering plants in the fossil record “an abominable mystery”. Has this mystery been finally solved?
    Research yields understanding of Darwin’s “abominable mystery”.
  • In the 7 December 2012 issue of Science, three prominent ecologists warn of an alarming increase in death rates among trees 100-300 years old in many of the world’s forests, woodlands, savannahs, farming areas, and even in cities.
    Are the world’s big trees dying? and Why are the world’s older trees disappearing?
  • “For years, mistletoe has suffered from a split reputation: either the decorative prelude to a sweet Christmas kiss or the tree-killing parasite that must be mercilessly excised for the good of the forests. Now a recent Australian study has come up with a surprising new understanding of the evergreen plant: It is a key to keeping forest life healthy.” from:
    Beyond the kiss, Mistletoe helps feed forests, study suggests.
  • “As the human population increases, so too do the demands and stresses on agriculture. In the January 2013 issue of International Journal of Plant Sciences, Penn State University Waller Professor of Plant Biology Dr. Sarah Assmann explores how the responses to environmental stresses by one small, genetically diverse plant species might illuminate possible approaches to addressing growing human demand for crop products amid decreasing resources.” from:
    Can observations of a hardy weed help feed the world?

    HowPlantsWork © 2008-2013 All Rights Reserved.

    Older Posts »